- adjusted for 1.8.3./hdf5/hdf5-config.patch

Changed files:
    hdf5-config.patch -> 1.11

diff --git a/hdf5-config.patch b/hdf5-config.patch
index 804baf348bb2cfd33f4bea122063262ae24bca10..90417b040914528d6a8d8d560acb7216edd8ab7c 100644 (file)
--- a/hdf5-config.patch
+++ b/hdf5-config.patch
@@ -1,25 +1,26 @@
---- hdf5-1.8.1/config/gnu-flags.orig   2008-05-29 18:39:02.000000000 +0200
-+++ hdf5-1.8.1/config/gnu-flags        2008-06-04 22:33:32.839106766 +0200
+--- hdf5-1.8.3/config/gnu-flags.orig   2009-09-06 10:47:13.000000000 +0200
++++ hdf5-1.8.3/config/gnu-flags        2009-09-06 10:48:19.000000000 +0200
 @@ -143,7 +143,6 @@
      # Production
      case "$cc_vendor-$cc_version" in
        gcc-2.95.[34])
 -        PROD_CFLAGS="-O3"
          ;;
-       gcc-3.[0-4]*|gcc-4.[0123]*)
+       gcc-4.[34]*)
+         # The optimization level is reduced for gcc 4.[34] due to problems
+@@ -153,7 +152,6 @@
+         # There's either a bug in gcc or our code. Need further investigation.
+       # Turn off all optimizations to allow the tests to pass for now.
+         # - AKC - 2009/04/19
+-        PROD_CFLAGS="-O0"
+         ;;
+       gcc-3.[0-4]*|gcc-4.[012]*)
          # The optimization level is reduced for gcc 3.* and 4.* due to problems
-@@ -151,14 +150,11 @@
+@@ -161,7 +159,6 @@
          # optimization levels (which shows up as failures for various integer
          # types -> long long conversions in the test/dtypes test).  Perhaps
          # later versions of gcc will fix this bug... - QAK - 2003/10/20
 -        PROD_CFLAGS="-O"
          ;;
-       gcc-4*)
-         # Be optimistic about future versions of gcc.. :-) - QAK - 2003/10/20
--        PROD_CFLAGS="-O3"
-         ;;
        *)
--        PROD_CFLAGS="-O"
-         ;;
-     esac
- 
+         PROD_CFLAGS="-O"