}
static int do_linear_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+commit 23751be0094012eb6b4756fa80ca54b3eb83069f
+Author: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
+Date: Thu Aug 25 15:59:16 2011 -0700
+
+ memcg: fix hierarchical oom locking
+
+ Commit 79dfdaccd1d5 ("memcg: make oom_lock 0 and 1 based rather than
+ counter") tried to oom lock the hierarchy and roll back upon
+ encountering an already locked memcg.
+
+ The code is confused when it comes to detecting a locked memcg, though,
+ so it would fail and rollback after locking one memcg and encountering
+ an unlocked second one.
+
+ The result is that oom-locking hierarchies fails unconditionally and
+ that every oom killer invocation simply goes to sleep on the oom
+ waitqueue forever. The tasks practically hang forever without anyone
+ intervening, possibly holding locks that trip up unrelated tasks, too.
+
+ Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>
+ Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
+ Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
+ Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
+ Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
+
+diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
+index 0e40f02..ebd1e86 100644
+--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
++++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
+@@ -1841,29 +1841,23 @@ static int mem_cgroup_hierarchical_reclaim(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem,
+ */
+ static bool mem_cgroup_oom_lock(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+ {
+- int lock_count = -1;
+ struct mem_cgroup *iter, *failed = NULL;
+ bool cond = true;
+
+ for_each_mem_cgroup_tree_cond(iter, mem, cond) {
+- bool locked = iter->oom_lock;
+-
+- iter->oom_lock = true;
+- if (lock_count == -1)
+- lock_count = iter->oom_lock;
+- else if (lock_count != locked) {
++ if (iter->oom_lock) {
+ /*
+ * this subtree of our hierarchy is already locked
+ * so we cannot give a lock.
+ */
+- lock_count = 0;
+ failed = iter;
+ cond = false;
+- }
++ } else
++ iter->oom_lock = true;
+ }
+
+ if (!failed)
+- goto done;
++ return true;
+
+ /*
+ * OK, we failed to lock the whole subtree so we have to clean up
+@@ -1877,8 +1871,7 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_oom_lock(struct mem_cgroup *mem)
+ }
+ iter->oom_lock = false;
+ }
+-done:
+- return lock_count;
++ return false;
+ }
+
+ /*