]> git.pld-linux.org Git - packages/kernel.git/blame - kernel-small_fixes.patch
- enabled RELOCATABLE on x86-64 (why we had that off?)
[packages/kernel.git] / kernel-small_fixes.patch
CommitLineData
08aa9d92 1--- linux-2.6.33/scripts/mod/modpost.c~ 2010-02-24 19:52:17.000000000 +0100
2+++ linux-2.6.33/scripts/mod/modpost.c 2010-03-07 14:26:47.242168558 +0100
3@@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
4 #include <stdio.h>
5 #include <ctype.h>
6 #include "modpost.h"
7-#include "../../include/generated/autoconf.h"
8+// PLD architectures don't use CONFIG_SYMBOL_PREFIX
9+//#include "../../include/generated/autoconf.h"
10 #include "../../include/linux/license.h"
11
12 /* Some toolchains use a `_' prefix for all user symbols. */
13
2136e199
AM
14--- linux-3.0/scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/check-lxdialog.sh~ 2011-07-22 04:17:23.000000000 +0200
15+++ linux-3.0/scripts/kconfig/lxdialog/check-lxdialog.sh 2011-08-25 21:26:04.799150642 +0200
16@@ -9,6 +9,12 @@
17 $cc -print-file-name=lib${lib}.${ext} | grep -q /
18 if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
19 echo "-l${lib}"
20+ for libt in tinfow tinfo ; do
21+ $cc -print-file-name=lib${libt}.${ext} | grep -q /
22+ if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
23+ echo "-l${libt}"
24+ fi
25+ done
26 exit
27 fi
28 done
44c0f99c 29
d16112f7
AM
30
31Hi all,
32 There is a risk of data loss with md/raid6 arrays running on Linux since
33 2.6.32.
34 If:
35 - the array is doubly degraded
36 - one or both failed devices are being recovered, and
37 - the array is written to
38
39 then it is possible for data on the array to be lost. The patch below fixes
40 the problem. If you apply the patch to an older kernel which has separate
41 handle_stripe5() and handle_stripe6() functions, be sure that patch changes
42 handle_stripe6().
43
44 There is no risk to an optimal array or a singly-degraded array. There is
45 also no risk on a doubly-degraded array which is not recovering a device or
46 is not receiving write requests.
47
48 If you have data on a RAID6 array, please consider how to avoid corruption,
49 possibly by applying the patch, possibly by removing any hot spares so
50 recovery does not automatically start.
51
52 This patch will be sent upstream shortly and will subsequently appear in
53 future "-stable" kernels.
54
55NeilBrown
56
57From f94e37dce722ec7b6666fd04be357f422daa02b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
58From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
59Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:57:07 +1000
60Subject: [PATCH] md/raid6: avoid data corruption during recovery of
61 double-degraded RAID6
62
63During recovery of a double-degraded RAID6 it is possible for
64some blocks not to be recovered properly, leading to corruption.
65
66If a write happens to one block in a stripe that would be written to a
67missing device, and at the same time that stripe is recovering data
68to the other missing device, then that recovered data may not be written.
69
70This patch skips, in the double-degraded case, an optimisation that is
71only safe for single-degraded arrays.
72
73Bug was introduced in 2.6.32 and fix is suitable for any kernel since
74then. In an older kernel with separate handle_stripe5() and
75handle_stripe6() functions that patch must change handle_stripe6().
76
77Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (2.6.32+)
78Fixes: 6c0069c0ae9659e3a91b68eaed06a5c6c37f45c8
79Cc: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
80Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
81Reported-by: "Manibalan P" <pmanibalan@amiindia.co.in>
82Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090423
83Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
84
85diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
86index 6b2d615d1094..183588b11fc1 100644
87--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
88+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
89@@ -3817,6 +3817,8 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
90 set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &dev->flags);
91 if (prexor)
92 continue;
93+ if (s.failed > 1)
94+ continue;
95 if (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags) ||
96 ((i == sh->pd_idx || i == sh->qd_idx) &&
97 s.failed == 0))
98
99
This page took 0.22082 seconds and 4 git commands to generate.