- updated to 2.15.92.0.2.

[packages/crosssparc64-binutils.git] / binutils-pr338.patch

2004-08-18  Alan Modra  <amodra@bigpond.net.au>

	PR 338
	* elflink.c (bfd_elf_record_link_assignment): Add comment about
	changing bfd_link_hash_undefined to bfd_link_hash_new.

2004-08-18  Alan Modra  <amodra@bigpond.net.au>

	PR 338
	* ldexp.c (fold_name): Don't call bfd_link_add_undef if the symbol
	was already on the undefs list.

--- src/bfd/elflink.c	2004/08/17 08:51:07	1.96
+++ src/bfd/elflink.c	2004/08/18 02:45:42	1.97
@@ -434,7 +434,12 @@
 
   /* Since we're defining the symbol, don't let it seem to have not
      been defined.  record_dynamic_symbol and size_dynamic_sections
-     may depend on this.  */
+     may depend on this.
+     ??? Changing bfd_link_hash_undefined to bfd_link_hash_new (or
+     to bfd_link_hash_undefweak, see linker.c:link_action) runs the risk
+     of some later symbol manipulation setting the symbol back to
+     bfd_link_hash_undefined, and the linker trying to add the symbol to
+     the undefs list twice.  */
   if (h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefweak
       || h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefined)
     h->root.type = bfd_link_hash_new;
--- src/ld/ldexp.c	2004/06/24 04:46:27	1.31
+++ src/ld/ldexp.c	2004/08/18 02:45:43	1.32
@@ -576,7 +576,8 @@
 	    {
 	      h->type = bfd_link_hash_undefined;
 	      h->u.undef.abfd = NULL;
-	      bfd_link_add_undef (link_info.hash, h);
+	      if (h->und_next == NULL)
+		bfd_link_add_undef (link_info.hash, h);
 	    }
 	}
       break;