From 654c46984262acc8a087310eeb426d2a71fc623e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@pld-linux.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:38:28 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] - use glibc definition of dev_t, not kernel one. Someone has
 to check if this doesn't break anything

Changed files:
    util-linux-dev_t.patch -> 1.1
    util-linux.spec -> 1.232
---
 util-linux-dev_t.patch | 13 +++++++++++++
 util-linux.spec        |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 util-linux-dev_t.patch

diff --git a/util-linux-dev_t.patch b/util-linux-dev_t.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7fd130d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/util-linux-dev_t.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+diff -durN -x '*~' util-linux-2.12.orig/mount/my_dev_t.h util-linux-2.12/mount/my_dev_t.h
+--- util-linux-2.12.orig/mount/my_dev_t.h	2003-07-16 22:05:50.000000000 +0200
++++ util-linux-2.12/mount/my_dev_t.h	2004-12-19 14:31:34.467427960 +0100
+@@ -3,5 +3,9 @@
+ /* maybe we need __kernel_old_dev_t -- later */
+ /* for ancient systems use "unsigned short" */
+ 
++#if 0
+ #include <linux/posix_types.h>
+ #define my_dev_t __kernel_dev_t
++#else
++#define my_dev_t dev_t
++#endif
diff --git a/util-linux.spec b/util-linux.spec
index ca5ccd4..259a2e8 100644
--- a/util-linux.spec
+++ b/util-linux.spec
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ Patch12:	%{name}-ppc-hwclock.patch
 Patch13:	%{name}-no_multiline.patch
 Patch14:	%{name}-amd64.patch
 Patch15:	%{name}-crypto-debian.patch
+Patch16:	%{name}-dev_t.patch
 BuildRequires:	gettext-devel
 BuildRequires:	grep
 %{!?_with_uClibc:BuildRequires:	ncurses-devel >= 5.0}
@@ -344,6 +345,7 @@ Obs
 %patch13 -p0
 %patch14 -p1
 %patch15 -p1
+%patch16 -p1
 
 %build
 CC="%{__cc}"
-- 
2.44.0