fi
done
-diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
-index 7a0c800..ec5ebbb 100644
---- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
-+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
-@@ -4103,6 +4103,14 @@ rtl8169_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
- /* Get MAC address */
- for (i = 0; i < ETH_ALEN; i++)
- dev->dev_addr[i] = RTL_R8(MAC0 + i);
-+
-+ if (!is_valid_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr)) {
-+ /* Report it and use a random ethernet address instead */
-+ netdev_err(dev, "Invalid MAC address: %pM\n", dev->dev_addr);
-+ random_ether_addr(dev->dev_addr);
-+ netdev_info(dev, "Using random MAC address: %pM\n",
-+ dev->dev_addr);
-+ }
- memcpy(dev->perm_addr, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len);
-
- SET_ETHTOOL_OPS(dev, &rtl8169_ethtool_ops);
---
-1.7.7.3
+
+Hi all,
+ There is a risk of data loss with md/raid6 arrays running on Linux since
+ 2.6.32.
+ If:
+ - the array is doubly degraded
+ - one or both failed devices are being recovered, and
+ - the array is written to
+
+ then it is possible for data on the array to be lost. The patch below fixes
+ the problem. If you apply the patch to an older kernel which has separate
+ handle_stripe5() and handle_stripe6() functions, be sure that patch changes
+ handle_stripe6().
+
+ There is no risk to an optimal array or a singly-degraded array. There is
+ also no risk on a doubly-degraded array which is not recovering a device or
+ is not receiving write requests.
+
+ If you have data on a RAID6 array, please consider how to avoid corruption,
+ possibly by applying the patch, possibly by removing any hot spares so
+ recovery does not automatically start.
+
+ This patch will be sent upstream shortly and will subsequently appear in
+ future "-stable" kernels.
+
+NeilBrown
+
+From f94e37dce722ec7b6666fd04be357f422daa02b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
+Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:57:07 +1000
+Subject: [PATCH] md/raid6: avoid data corruption during recovery of
+ double-degraded RAID6
+
+During recovery of a double-degraded RAID6 it is possible for
+some blocks not to be recovered properly, leading to corruption.
+
+If a write happens to one block in a stripe that would be written to a
+missing device, and at the same time that stripe is recovering data
+to the other missing device, then that recovered data may not be written.
+
+This patch skips, in the double-degraded case, an optimisation that is
+only safe for single-degraded arrays.
+
+Bug was introduced in 2.6.32 and fix is suitable for any kernel since
+then. In an older kernel with separate handle_stripe5() and
+handle_stripe6() functions that patch must change handle_stripe6().
+
+Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (2.6.32+)
+Fixes: 6c0069c0ae9659e3a91b68eaed06a5c6c37f45c8
+Cc: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
+Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
+Reported-by: "Manibalan P" <pmanibalan@amiindia.co.in>
+Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090423
+Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
+
+diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
+index 6b2d615d1094..183588b11fc1 100644
+--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
++++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
+@@ -3817,6 +3817,8 @@ static void handle_stripe(struct stripe_head *sh)
+ set_bit(R5_Wantwrite, &dev->flags);
+ if (prexor)
+ continue;
++ if (s.failed > 1)
++ continue;
+ if (!test_bit(R5_Insync, &dev->flags) ||
+ ((i == sh->pd_idx || i == sh->qd_idx) &&
+ s.failed == 0))
projects / packages / kernel.git / blobdiff